Integrating Expenditure and Tax Decisions: The Marginal Cost of Funds and the Marginal Benefit of Projects
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper seeks to clarify the extent to which the rule for providing public goods ought to correct for the distortionary cost of raising funds. We argue that, in evaluating public projects, the marginal cost of funds (MCF) concept must be supplemented by a symmetrical concept, which we label the marginal benefit of public projects, or MBP, which indicates the value to individuals of the dollars spent. Each of these concepts can be decomposed into two separate components, one reflecting efficiency and the other characterizing the distributional impact of the project itself or its financing. We conclude that efficiency of the financing cannot be ignored, that distributional considerations are also relevant, and that the availability and optimality of tax instruments is critical for evaluating the appropriateness of proceeding with a public good-cum financing project. However, one can construct special cases, as in Kaplow (1996), where the simple cost-benefit criterion applies. JEL Classification: H21, H41, H43 * University of Michigan, ** Hebrew University Mailing Address: Shlomo Yitzhaki Dept. of Economics Hebrew University Jerusalem, 91905 Israel E-mail: [email protected] 1 We would like to thank Louis Kaplow and Stanley Winer, the editor and two anonymous referees for perceptive comments on earlier drafts.
منابع مشابه
Improving Long Run Marginal Cost based Pricing along with Extended Benefit Factor method for Revenue Reconciliation of Transmission Network in Restructured Power System
Abstract : There are several methods to cover the costs of a transmission system and distribution networks. These methods are divided into either incremental or marginal approaches, which can be either long-term or short-term. The main difference between the incremental and marginal approach is how to calculate the cost of using the network. In the incremental approach, simulation and in the ma...
متن کاملTax normalizations , the marginal cost of funds , and optimal environmental taxes *
Prior results on second-best optimal environmental taxes fail to hold under alternative tax normalizations, partly because the marginal cost of funds varies with the tax normalization. However, under any normalization, the optimal environmental tax typically lies below marginal damages. 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
متن کاملSubstitution and Income Effects at the Aggregate Level: the Effective Budget Constraint of the Government and the Flypaper Effect
This paper analyzes the effect of a change in lump-sum (private) income on the tax and expenditure decisions of a government constrained by taxpayers’ behavioral responses to the tax policy. Lump-sum changes of private income are generally characterized as pure income effects on taxpayers’ behavior, and usually considered in public finance theory as imposing no price effects on the economy. In ...
متن کاملRevenue Neutral Trade Reform with Many Households, Quotas and Tariffs
Government budget balance forces the endogenous use of distortionary tax instruments when an exogenous reform is implemented. The aggregate efficiency of such reforms is based on comparisons of simple summary measures of the Marginal Cost of Funds of the various tariff or quota changes with the Marginal Cost of Funds of the alternative taxes, or of the Marginal Benefit of Government supplied go...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001